This Article examines the constitutional and prudential policies underlying the standing requirement, and concludes that a federal court may render a valid judgment when the defendant fails to raise the standing issue prior to judgment
The standing, ripeness, and mootness doctrines are frequently criticized by those who seek greater a...
From the Introduction In the last Term at the United States Supreme Court [2022], standing was the c...
This 1981 article discusses principles of federal constitutional law. Professor Baker notes that the...
Standing is a precondition for any suit brought in federal court. This Commentary analyzes a Supreme...
The Supreme Court insists that Article III of the Constitution requires a litigant to have standing ...
Two recent United States Supreme Court cases on standing, Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Sto...
The Supreme Court insists that Article III of the Constitution requires a litigant to have standing ...
Recent Supreme Court decisions severely restrict the right of citizens to litigate in federal courts...
According to the Supreme Court, the Federal Constitution limits not only the types of matters that f...
The requirement of standing to sue in federal court is familiar, but the related requirement of stan...
Standing to raise a claim before a judicial tribunal is notoriously contested. Federal courts during...
In recent years, legislatures and their members have increasingly asserted standing to sue other bra...
On December 7, 2018, in Scahill v. District of Columbia, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District ...
When should states have standing? In recent years, there has been an explosion in literature on that...
The requirement of standing to sue in federal court is familiar, but the related requirement of stan...
The standing, ripeness, and mootness doctrines are frequently criticized by those who seek greater a...
From the Introduction In the last Term at the United States Supreme Court [2022], standing was the c...
This 1981 article discusses principles of federal constitutional law. Professor Baker notes that the...
Standing is a precondition for any suit brought in federal court. This Commentary analyzes a Supreme...
The Supreme Court insists that Article III of the Constitution requires a litigant to have standing ...
Two recent United States Supreme Court cases on standing, Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Sto...
The Supreme Court insists that Article III of the Constitution requires a litigant to have standing ...
Recent Supreme Court decisions severely restrict the right of citizens to litigate in federal courts...
According to the Supreme Court, the Federal Constitution limits not only the types of matters that f...
The requirement of standing to sue in federal court is familiar, but the related requirement of stan...
Standing to raise a claim before a judicial tribunal is notoriously contested. Federal courts during...
In recent years, legislatures and their members have increasingly asserted standing to sue other bra...
On December 7, 2018, in Scahill v. District of Columbia, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District ...
When should states have standing? In recent years, there has been an explosion in literature on that...
The requirement of standing to sue in federal court is familiar, but the related requirement of stan...
The standing, ripeness, and mootness doctrines are frequently criticized by those who seek greater a...
From the Introduction In the last Term at the United States Supreme Court [2022], standing was the c...
This 1981 article discusses principles of federal constitutional law. Professor Baker notes that the...